Seattle Met Magazine

The vacuum of space has more substance than this vapid periodical. Pages of ads sparsely intertwined with superficial tidbits masquerading as articles. Devoid of anything close to quality content or the semblance of thought. The wads of paper stuffed into airplane seatbacks are more informative and interesting. In fact I'd rather read the safety information pamphlet ad nauseum before I ever touch this dismal excuse for a publication. It doesn't even make good toilet paper. Way too scratchy. One cannot help but feel bad for the tree carcasses that were sacrificed during it's production.

After discontinuing my subscription a couple of years ago, I recently went back to the Seattle Met only to find that it's even worse than it was. Very many pages of ads and blocks of ads of different kinds that dominate the not so interesting texts. Also, it seems that if you want to be on the Top Docs list, for example, all you need to do is purchase a half page ad in the magazine. At least it looks that way because all the doctors who advertises in the magazine are on the top doctors lists in their respective specialties. Maybe the Met should also look at the reviews on Google maps to confirm their choices because some are dubious..

Our school yearbook team has used this magazine as a reference to design. The photography is amazing and the stories are interesting.

I just wasted $8 on the May, 2019 edition of Seattle Met. I found nothing of interest in the entire magazine. Lots of advertising. Little to no substance.

Very entertaining and knowledgeable about restaurants